Cannonpointer » 31 Dec 2013 6:57 am » wrote:
yet you felt a need to tick off a list of various perversions - a typical attempt at slut shaming, - rather than arguing the actual issue.
I could care less if you want to murder every brown person that ever walked the face of the earth - but why should I have to pay for it?
By the way - that's my attempt at contard shaming.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/82174/8217424902b6c81228bf987abe9a705268031beb" alt="Smile :)"
No, I felt the need to relay my opinion on government intrusion into sexual activities. I have stated numerous times that what one does sexually is of no concern of mine. If you feel the need to **** a women, a man, a sheep, a goat, etc. that is your choice. I don't care. Have at it.
With that said I should not have to pay for your elective choices. I should not have to pay extra for contraceptive services, abortificients, maternity, etc to subsidize your elective sexual activities. The reason I mention the above is that Prattle, Misty, and other progs turn every discussion of these services into one of having hangups about sex. They can't stay on the topic. And every time they do I will tick off a list of sexual activities that some consider perversions. The Constitution does not give the federal government the authority to be involved. So I could care less.
I hope this clears up any misunderstanding that you may have.