Blackvegetable » 16 May 2026, 7:59 am » wrote: ↑Again....Huey » 16 May 2026, 7:49 am » wrote: ↑ and it showed the jury answered NO when asked if enough evidence was provided for a finding of rape,
youuare not a smart person.
What is at issue is the VERDICT.
It is the VERDICT from which Team Grifty petitioned for relief.
It did so on specific grounds.
You should learn what they are.
Huey » 16 May 2026, 8:07 am » wrote: ↑Thisis what is at issue. Stop reframing and running from your words, Melty.Blackvegetable » 16 May 2026, 7:59 am » wrote: ↑Again....Huey » 16 May 2026, 7:49 am » wrote: ↑ and it showed the jury answered NO when asked if enough evidence was provided for a finding of rape,
youuare not a smart person.
What is at issue is the VERDICT.
It is the VERDICT from which Team Grifty petitioned for relief.
It did so on specific grounds.
You should learn what they are.
Blackvegetable » 15 May 2026, 12:56 pm » wrote: ↑IT....WAS....A...JURY...TRIAL...., YOU....BRAINDEAD....LUMP....OF...****...Beekeeper » 15 May 2026, 12:43 pm » wrote: ↑ So when the SCOTUD overturns the verdict of a CORRUPT JUDGE, will you bow down and worship at my feet??
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
It is so entertaining when you edit posts (lie) to change context or win an argument.Blackvegetable » 16 May 2026, 11:48 am » wrote: ↑Controlly,Huey » 16 May 2026, 8:07 am » wrote: ↑ Thisis what is at issue. Stop reframing and running from your words, Melty.
Controlly yourself.