Liberal Forum

Huey » 10 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

10 minutes ago

Huey » 23 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

23 minutes ago

Blackvegetable » 24 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

24 minutes ago

No...that is NOT what the finding means.

Make your case.  And remember, I am not going to do your work.  If not, you can **** off you ignorant cowardly bitch.
 


 

Blackvegetable » 17 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

17 minutes ago

Huey » 23 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

23 minutes ago

Make your case.  

It means that the jury did not find sufficient evidence to conclude that the penetration alleged was penile.

Acknowledge that you were answered.

Correctly.

Why did Kaplan opine?

 


 

You didn't answer a question.  I did't ask one.  You made your **** case which is not really correct and here is why:

It means that Carrol DID NOT provide sufficient evidence that she was raped under NY Law at the time,  You stupid **** it tells you on the Jury Verdict Form what it means.  Any narrative other than what question number asked is not the correct answer.  

You posted what he opined in the OP. 

 

Blackvegetable » 3 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

3 minutes ago

Huey » 10 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

10 minutes ago

You didn't answer a question

Sez who?


You really don't understand **** about the law in general and less about this case in particular. 

A claim made in a petition for relief IS NOT A FACT.

It is an ARGUMENT, to which the judge is OBLIGED to respond, in the form of an Opinion. But he doesn't speak for himself, he speaks for the court.

You have dispensed with reading that document, insisting it is "personal opinion" and irrelevant. 


It is a position so stupid as to beggar my fertile imagination.