Liberal Forum

Beekeeper » Today, 5:09 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 5:09 am

Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 8:23 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 8:23 pm

"167!"

"WE have to Save Democracy".

"But, but we need a DO OVER since we are too **** STUPID to get good candidates and the COMMIES are taking over!!"

It reminds me of dem Sen Robert Torricelli when he was on the ballot in NJ in 2003 but got federal corruption charges against him.  The republican challenger had a large lead in the polls.  It had been years since a pub had won the seat.  Torricelli dropped out AFTER the deadline to take changes to the ballot.  The dems went to court and said that NJ law did not take into this situation and allowed them to make the change.  This occurred just over a month before the election.