Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » Today, 5:21 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 5:21 am

So **** g'ddammned stupid 


After reviewing thousands of pages of evidence over the past few weeks, Ms. Pirro determined the Hearn indictment needed to be rescinded before it was thrown out of court, according to two people close to the situation. 

Her critics have questioned whether her motive was nearly so straightforward or altruistic. 

They suggest that Ms. Pirro’s decision to withdraw the indictment was self-protective: She might be trying to head off disciplinary action that could result if grand jury testimony or other internal materials are made public. Mr. Hearn’s lawyers said she was guilty of what she had accused Mr. Burgum of doing — rushing to take an action to appease her boss — and that she had ample access, before indicting Mr. Hearn, to evidence showing that the damage had been caused by the contractor.


 

And now for the rest of the  story......Ms. Pirro’s filing suggested that Mr. Burgum had committed the twofold sin of failing to competently oversee the renovation, then prodding Mr. Trump to accept the vandals-did-it story. Ms. Pirro said that her staff had relied almost exclusively on claims by Interior Department officials that extensive damage to the lining was caused by Mr. Hearn and other vandals who were observed tugging at or removing pieces of material from the wall.

 After reviewing thousands of pages of evidence, she concluded the department had rushed and “botched” the renovation, and that bad information from Park Police officials had led her to cite “tremendous evidence” against Mr. Hearn that did not exist.

AND


Ms. Pirro knew full well that her U-turn could infuriate Mr. Trump, but decided to cram her filing with enough evidence to decisively disprove Mr. Burgum’s claims.


https://www.nytimes.com/2026/08/04/us/p ... =url-share

Sounds like the right thing was done here, a wrong was righted, and still you bitch.