Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 2:33 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 2:33 pm

Huey » Yesterday, 2:14 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 2:14 pm

1.  I knew you were going there.  Firearms are like tools.  I hav told you that before. There is one for different purposes.  Depending how I am going to carry is how I determine which 9 to carry.  The shotgun and the judge are for defense.  And the 22 PPK is for plinking.  So no, there is no check.  For the record, according to your ignorant definition, your butt buddy roshambo is an ammosexual.

2.  You will have to provide proof.  Post these threads or accept your loss on not only the point, but the topic.  

Here is your question.  You are saying that if you own more than two guns you are an ammosexual.  So a guy who is hunter who has different rifles for different game and has a pistol is an ammosexual (in a negative manner) simply because of the number of guns he has?  

If you don't answer DO NOT ask me any more questions.

1. There's a check.

I hav told you that before. There is one for different purposes.  Depending how I am going to carry is how I determine which 9 to carry. 

That sounds more like a fashion statement than a "purpose"


CHECK!

2.  You will have to provide proof.  Post these threads or accept your loss on not only the point, but the topic.  

Natch.....Of course YOU don't remember...

viewtopic.php?f=3&t=103222


viewtopic.php?f=3&t=103008

viewtopic.php?f=3&t=102649

viewtopic.php?f=3&t=102325


4 of 20

20%...that's material...


CHECK.