Blackvegetable » 31 minutes ago » wrote: ↑
Huey » 41 minutes ago » wrote: ↑
Try that again. Oh, my stand was he was not being prosecuted as we speak. I was correct, You lost and you are not man enough admit that.
**** off.
When you explain why he is talking to the AG of NH.
Ignoring that fact does not make you "correct"..
1. Acknowledge he is not being prosecuted right now or post the date the trial started.
2. I have no clue why he is talking to the AG. Let me know when you find out.
3. **** you. You have been ignoring facts since this thread started. Right now you have created a diversion from the fact the daily beast **** you and your refuse to accept that fact.