Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

7 minutes ago

You show up...yap ignorantly....run from questions...

The trial evidence of the harm to Ms. Carroll as a result of being assaulted and digitally raped supports the jury’s $2 million award as reasonable compensation for her pain and suffering. Ms. Carroll testified in detail with respect to the physical, emotional, and psychological injury she suffered after the incident with Mr. Trump

YOU accusing others of running from questions?  That's rich, ******.  It is only YOUR questions I don't answer, ******, because you don't answer any yourself.  

My work is done here.  If you have a case you may bring it, like everyone else here, and debunk me.

AI OverviewIn the 1990s, New York State penal law strictly defined rape as vaginal sexual intercourse involving penile penetration committed by force or with a person incapable of consent, while categorizing other nonconsensual forms of penetration or contact under different offenses like "sexual abuse" or "criminal sexual act". [1, 2]
Key Elements of the 1990s Definition

• Penile-Vaginal Requirement: The legal charge of "rape" specifically required contact between the penis and the vagina. Penetration of the vagina or other orifices using fingers, objects, or any body part other than a penis was legally prosecuted under separate statutes (such as sexual abuse or sodomy/criminal sexual acts), rather than rape