Blackvegetable » 17 minutes ago » wrote: ↑
Huey » 23 minutes ago » wrote: ↑
So, Bitch, after you latest fictional tale, you wish to go back to the topic? Run, Bitch, Run.
No questions, bitch. I have made my point. They do not have a slam dunk case. Or maybe, bitch, if you are as good as you say you are, you should offer your services, pro bono, to the state and prosecute the guy.
you latest fictional tale
How the **** would you know?
you wish to go back to the topic? Run, Bitch, Run.
The topic from which you're running.
I made reference to this weeks ago..
No questions, bitch. I have made my point.
no, you haven't..
I've seen no case...
And you've been wrong about everything.
Running? LMAO! I have brought facts, citations and sources. You have rhetoric. Narrative. And questions.
My point stands that if the state had a slam dunk case there would be no negotiations. They would have refiled, gone to court, and convicted him.
They haven't, Bitch.