Liberal Forum

Huey » Yesterday, 2:36 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 2:36 pm

Huey » Yesterday, 2:22 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 2:22 pm

Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 1:59 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 1:59 pm

This is getting silly..

 



 

FIFY

Huey » Yesterday, 1:53 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 1:53 pm

Sorry, diverter, but your comments about a long "rifle" and the purpose of the gun came first.  WTF are you talking about with the long rifle?  It is not like he charged the school with an 18th or 19th century rifle.  And you now have the purpose of the gun used.  So?  Questions are not answers, ignorant one.
 



 

Blackvegetable » 16 Oct 2026, 12:16 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Oct 2026, 12:16 pm

After child with "long rifle" shoots 4.

Because what else is that long rifle for?



 

Run from your words, ******.  Isn't multi quote a bitch?  WTF is your definition of a long rifle, bitch?  And don't come back and say a 22 long.


 

Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 2:29 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 2:29 pm

Huey » Yesterday, 2:22 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 2:22 pm

FIFY


 

You didn't answer the question. 

Which must be why you're diverting.

Can you enlist at 17 without parental permission?


 

You realize it takes less than 30 seconds to fix what you deleted.

I am not diverting.  The post about long "rifles" (WTF are they) was your first post to the thread.  I am taking the issues in order.  Not according to your diversions. As usual you are running from what you got wrong, ******.  You are not much of a man.  Probably why no woman wants you. They know you won't protect them.

Like your latest diversion about parental permission.  We will get to that diversion when we clean up your first ****.

But I will say 16 year olds can be tried as an adult depending on the state in murder cases,  That should shut you up.