Liberal Forum

Huey » Today, 10:15 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 10:15 am

Blackvegetable » Today, 10:11 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 10:11 am

Huey » Today, 9:54 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 9:54 am

I accepted your deal.  Post the question you want answered.  You will then answer this.  

One question for one question.  Just as you said.

 1.  What is your definition of a long rifle?  Not an 18th or 19th century rifle, but your definition as you used the term.

2.  Acknowledge you have been answered as to the purpose of the Mossberg.

3.  Acknowledge the 16 year "kid" you spoke of would have been tried as an adult if he lived.

It is that simple.  Shove that zero integrity "jive" up your fat ***.

That "simple"?

I see 3 items.


That would cost you 3 answers, all in advance.

 


 

Two of those are acknowledgement to a question YOU ASKED and a comment you made.  If you are not man enough to acknowledge answers and points made about your comments what should I bother?

Ask your **** question and be done with it.  Remember to use the reply feature to PROVE it was based prior to my long rifle question.
 

 

Blackvegetable » Today, 11:44 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 11:44 am

Huey » Today, 10:15 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 10:15 am

Two of those are acknowledgement to a question YOU ASKED and a comment you made.  If you are not man enough to acknowledge answers and points made about your comments what should I bother?

Ask your **** question and be done with it.  Remember to use the reply feature to PROVE it was based prior to my long rifle question.
  

and now the qualifications..