Liberal Forum

Huey » Yesterday, 9:58 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 9:58 am

Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 9:52 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 9:52 am

Huey » Yesterday, 9:25 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 9:25 am

Sorry, that is not the acknowledgment that your challenge was accepted with no conditions prior to your yes or no question.  Acknowledge that and you will get the answer you are looking for, spoiled princess. 

But you are still running from your words in your first post, twat
 

 

Sorry, that is not the acknowledgment that your challenge was accepted with no conditions prior to your yes or no question.  Acknowledge that and you will get the answer you are looking for, spoiled princess. 

But you are still running from your words in your first post, twat

 

 

Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 10:09 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 10:09 am

Huey » Yesterday, 9:58 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 9:58 am

Sorry, that is not the acknowledgment that your challenge was accepted with no conditions prior to your yes or no question.  Acknowledge that and you will get the answer you are looking for, spoiled princess. 

But you are still running from your words in your first post, twat
 

Why should I give a ****?

 

Because you editing of post by deleting relevant portions bit you in your flabby ***.  You delete **** than later DEMAND I answer question that were already discussed.  That's on you, twat..

But let's see, I'll give you the answer.  YES.  Now, answer the **** question, twat:

WHAT IS A LONG RIFLE IN CONTEXT OF THE OP?  YOUR DEFINITION WILL NOT INCLUDE AN 18TH/19TH CENTURY RIFLE.