Huey » Yesterday, 2:10 pm » wrote: ↑
Huey » Yesterday, 2:00 pm » wrote: ↑
Huey » Yesterday, 1:36 pm » wrote: ↑
Time to answer the long rifle question, you lying piece of ****.
I can delete **** as well, ****** boy.
As I said, controlly, I answered your **** question. As you continue to run from your ******* long rifle post I have given you the opportunity to explain what is wrong with my answer, or rewrite the question,
YOU are running from doing that. It doesn't matter. I just proved that the M16 family of firearms has multiple designs.
Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 2:03 pm » wrote: ↑
Huey » Yesterday, 2:00 pm » wrote: ↑
As I said, controlly, I answered your **** question. As you continue to run from your ******* long rifle post I have given you the opportunity to explain what is wrong with my answer, or rewrite the question,
YOU are running from doing that. It doesn't matter. I just proved that the M16 family of firearms has multiple designs.
What you SAY is entirely irrelevant because you lie...
As I said, controlly, I answered your **** question. As you continue to run from your ******* long rifle post I have given you the opportunity to explain what is wrong with my answer, or rewrite the question,
YOU are running from doing that. It doesn't matter. I just proved that the M16 family of firearms has multiple designs.
**** you.
I quoted it when I answered it. I also posted the specific portion with the question mark at least times. Stop with the games and wither specify what you don't understand about may answer, reword the question, or admit I answered and answer my question.
As I said, controlly, I answered your **** question. As you continue to run from your ******* long rifle post I have given you the opportunity to explain what is wrong with my answer, or rewrite the question,
YOU are running from doing that. It doesn't matter. I just proved that the M16 family of firearms has multiple designs.