User avatar
Huey
Yesterday 11:03 am
User avatar
      
37,872 posts
Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 10:44 am » wrote: ↑
Beekeeper » Yesterday, 10:22 am » wrote: ↑ I have. MULTIPLE TIMES!!

Because the ANSWER kicks your *** doesn't mean you can keep trying to get an answer that suits your **** ideology.

FACTS are persistent little things that YOU HATE and will RUN FROM MASSIVELY!!

Chase me some more, ****!!

Did your KNEEGROW GOD's ovomitcare REDUCE COSTS OF HEALTHCARE AND REDUCE GOVERNMENT EXPENDITURES?? When you answer that one, we can talk. UNTIL THEN, **** OFF!!

Run ****, RUN!!  Image   Image   Image   Image   Image
Huey avatar Huey +5 9 minutes ago


Now pay attention.


NO ONE, who isn't a crackhead, expected ACA to reduce the COST of Healthcare...the aim was to reduce the RATE OF GROWTH in AGGREGATE expenditures.

Do either of you idiots follow so far?

 
Consider your alleged grasp of the of the lEnglish language.  You just called Obama a crackcare.

https://youtu.be/_o65vMUk5so?si=TG493Qa1Jt5vrZfU 
BV: If you're going to answer questions, we can play.
viewtopic.php?p=2938094#p2938094
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
Updated 3 minutes ago
© 2012-2026 Liberal Forum

Search