User avatar
Huey
Yesterday 8:44 am
User avatar
      
37,945 posts
Huey » Yesterday, 8:14 am » wrote: ↑
Blackvegetable » 22 Oct 2026, 3:35 pm » wrote: ↑
Huey » 22 Oct 2026, 12:50 pm » wrote: ↑ If that is not your argument, 

You're a **** idiot.


You cannot remember ****.


The citation is the EVIDENCE supporting my argument, while making an ignorant little quimm of you.

Nod


 
Cool, so you are saying that EVWRY SINGLE weapon on the two list found at the source of that citation are all THE SAME **** DESIGN.

 

 
 
Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 8:41 am » wrote: ↑
Huey » Yesterday, 8:14 am » wrote: ↑ Cool, so you are saying that 
It appears what you are saying is that unless you dumb it down for yourself, you don't understand what I'm saying.

Sounds like a Quimmie problem to me.

 
Sorry, I don't answer to edited post.  But I still don't see an argument.  So I will stick with your are saying every single weapon in the two lists at your source are all the same design.

Now that's **** stupid.
BV: If you're going to answer questions, we can play.
viewtopic.php?p=2938094#p2938094
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 2nd Sporter Loss: viewtopic.php?p=2941076#p2941076
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
Updated 1 minute ago
© 2012-2026 Liberal Forum

Search