Blackvegetable » Today, 9:32 am » wrote: ↑
Huey » Today, 9:25 am » wrote: ↑
And I told you I never assumed that. You do that a lot.
And no, I have not defended a vote fraudster. I have shown how your source led you astray, had to issue a correction you knew nothing about, and that the conviction was overturned and they STILL have not convicted him again.
Why do you lie so much, Psycho Stalker?
If you aren't, what is your point?
And no, I have not defended a vote fraudster.
In spite of the objective fact of his guilt, you have declared him innocent.
I have shown how your source led you astray,
It didn't
had to issue a correction
It didn't
you knew nothing about,
I did.
and that the conviction was overturned and they STILL have not convicted him again.
He is still being prosecuted...
If he is still being prosecute it means they have to prove him guilty. Remember, you're the **** who thinks he is lawyer. Yet you can't grasp that most basic staple of our legal system