The problem is the insurance mandate's primary purpose is not to make sure you, and those like you, have all those preventive services included. It mandated so that the insurance companies have a pool of money available to cover someone else.RichClem » 01 Jan 2014 11:43 am » wrote:
I should have used a term other than "emergency." If someone develops cancer or some other sickness or condition that required extensive treatment, I personally would want insurance that covered it.
But I wouldn't want my plan to cover routine tests and treatment, doctor's visits, etc, and I would choose a moderately high deductible for illness or accidents.
And yes, I was referring to insurance companies as middlemen, as opposed to individuals choosing what care or tests they want.
When people have little interest on controlling costs because treatment is free or very cheap via co-pay, costs explode. Insurance companies cannot possibly keep track of what an individual patient really needs.