20 Aug 2023 9:36 am
Continued:
The Crux
Here’s the kicker, and it’s the reason for the lengthy introduction and explanation regarding how the protein carried by the virus exploits our immune defenses and is so deadly. If, and it appears more and more likely with the passage of time, the SARS COV2 protein was manufactured in a laboratory precisely for the purposes of weaponizing the virus – something we have been studying since 2004 – then surely instructing the body to produce the identical protein, or even a portion thereof, would have the same or similar deadly consequences for our physiology?
It is a logical conclusion to draw and a concern that science must definitively address before we advance any further treatment. In the interim, while we consider and evaluate the real medical dangers associated with the Covid vaccines, it would behoove governments and scientists to proceed cautiously. They have been warned repeatedly and chosen to ignore the safety signals and adverse events surrounding the vaccines.
Considering a suspension of child vaccination programs appears sensible and practical, as there is no immediate risk to children from SARS COV2 and the risk of adverse reactions to the vaccines appears to offer a real and present danger to the public health of children across the globe.
We need more transparent, independent science, cautious science, directed at answering the questions raised above relating to the why. Why are vaccinated people dying, and why, given the evolution of the virus in less serious forms, do we still aggressively pursue vaccination campaigns for the very young?
The Crux
Here’s the kicker, and it’s the reason for the lengthy introduction and explanation regarding how the protein carried by the virus exploits our immune defenses and is so deadly. If, and it appears more and more likely with the passage of time, the SARS COV2 protein was manufactured in a laboratory precisely for the purposes of weaponizing the virus – something we have been studying since 2004 – then surely instructing the body to produce the identical protein, or even a portion thereof, would have the same or similar deadly consequences for our physiology?
It is a logical conclusion to draw and a concern that science must definitively address before we advance any further treatment. In the interim, while we consider and evaluate the real medical dangers associated with the Covid vaccines, it would behoove governments and scientists to proceed cautiously. They have been warned repeatedly and chosen to ignore the safety signals and adverse events surrounding the vaccines.
Considering a suspension of child vaccination programs appears sensible and practical, as there is no immediate risk to children from SARS COV2 and the risk of adverse reactions to the vaccines appears to offer a real and present danger to the public health of children across the globe.
We need more transparent, independent science, cautious science, directed at answering the questions raised above relating to the why. Why are vaccinated people dying, and why, given the evolution of the virus in less serious forms, do we still aggressively pursue vaccination campaigns for the very young?