10 Apr 2026 8:31 am
Numbers? I don't see any numbers! I suppose "All" to you means 100% and that number couldn't be farther from the truth.Cannonpointer » 06 Apr 2026, 9:09 pm » wrote: ↑ Considering the US is the one starting the wars NATO fights in; and
Considering the money from ALL the members goes to the US MIC, strengthening the US as a global superpower; and
Considering NATO is basically a beard for the US empire;
I don't see a problem with those numbers. Do you?
Take notes, there will be a test later on:
Top NATO Member Arms Suppliers (2020–2025):
United States: The dominant supplier, holding 42% of global arms exports.
France: A top 5 global exporter, providing nearly 10% of major weapons, with major exports of fighter jets and ships.
Germany: A major supplier focusing on land systems, advanced ammunition, and air defense.
United Kingdom: A significant exporter of military technology and warships.
Turkey (Türkiye): Expanding its role in supplying UAVs and electronic warfare systems.
Netherlands: Contributes significantly to the European defense sector.
Consider your statement debunked!
NATO does not require that percentage of GDP be deposited into a NATO checking account. NATO members are required to spend that percentage of GDP on their own defenses and support the administration side of NATO.
It's been estimated that NATO allies have missed their spending targets by $850 billion in the last decade. The total unpaid for the previous 60 years is a massive number. I suggest closing all US bases in those countries and let them fend for themselves.
Not once in the rest of your post did you mention Iran as the "#1 state sponsor of terror", since 1984 no less. I can't really imagine why you and others throw so much support behind terrorist.
This isn't over, Iran's 10 point plan is laughable. This is merely a resupply break.
1 Nomination
ROG62 Apr 09, 2026
Go to original post on Apr 08, 2026 8:53am