Cannonpointer » 04 Feb 2024, 3:56 pm » wrote: ↑ I gave it a good skim.
The arguments are facile, reductionist, and historically revisionist. You have so many falsehoods and half-truths and quarter-truths ad contradictions packed in there that a proper take down would require several posts - and, frankly, you appear to be operating at an intellectual level which makes dubious the prospect that you would benefit from an honest critique of your ideas.
I think pointing and laughing is the more appropriate response - no offense.