Skans » 01 Aug 2023, 1:08 pm » wrote: ↑ Say what you want, but you have no refutation to what I've said. The real question is "will 1 juror agree with what I've said?"
I will admit I haven't been hanging onto every word said in this investigation. That second statement, you have a link to Trump or one of his lawyers stating that was the purpose for taking the classified documents? I haven't seen the docs, maybe you have. Someone put that notion in your head or it was a complete ***-pull on your part. You can easily defend your statement with a link.Trump was justified in keeping documents that could be used in defending him against multiple attempts to judicially persecute him.