20 Apr 2022 5:21 pm
I addressed the contents with credible articles from scientists, epidemiologists, and leading researchers (Harvard and University of Michigan Medical School); not 2 anti vaccine funeral directors.freeman » 20 Apr 2022, 3:22 pm » wrote: ↑ I thought you were asking for a link to your ridiculous article that suggested someone writing “the experimental shot” was somehow in error, as the author went on to make a fool of himself in his attempted defamation of the author he was attacking.
Not dissimilar to your ignoring the content in that post, and reducing yourself to attacking the messenger now rather than the message, which is the fallback of those outside of truth that are unable to defend their position.
Links to the archive are in fact links, to articles by and about professional epidemiologists, virologists, vaccinologists, pathologists and front line treating physicians, that happen to be handy to retrieve and post in here. Usually copy and pasted articles with added bolded and enlarged font emphasizing more important parts so people who don't like to read can get the gist of it.
The threads also often contain several supporting posts as well.
Why not try addressing the contents rather than the container?
Why not try actually replying to my post instead of wasting both of our time?
The covid19forum that you repeatedly cited has anecdotal discussions from non accredited nobodies.