Most economists don't know about economics. Richclem also isn't an economist. He further cherry picks the ones who do. So, being an economist doesn't actually matter to him. It only matters if the economist happens to agree with him. He will throw any authority under the bus if he says something that contradicts his views.Str8tEdge » 20 Jul 2014 8:54 pm » wrote:
Being a historian doesn't mean you know dick about economics.