B.See » 21 Aug 2022, 12:33 am » wrote: ↑
You're correct. It's not impartial.
Actually I showed you MORE partiality that perhaps I should've. Because as I've previously stated, some posters are pre-banned because of the consistency, frequency, and nature of their past responses to me - i.e. like continuous name calling, hate speech, fraudulent direct quotes, repeated nonsense content, and drive by **** postings, the last of which YOU'VE repeatedly engaged in.
So yes, I had every reason to pre-ban you TOO. And seeing as how you're still running around in another thread calling me the B.See troll, I think I'd be well justified in banning you from this one as well. Because SOME people APPARENTLY don't appreciate "nice."
See how THAT works?
This is getting confusing, you didn't behave like an annoying spamming troll in this thread so I decided to be nice in return... that's how it is supposed to work... but now you want to ban me anyway because I called you a troll in another thread... which is about you banning people.. including me... so people can't call you a troll.. while you behave like one.... you admit that's not impartial, yet you claim to be impartial in this thread because you didn't ban me... damn... I need more coffee, see if that helps...
In memory of Pumpkins