Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 23 Aug 2022, 9:17 am » wrote: ↑

23 Aug 2022, 9:17 am

Huey » 23 Aug 2022, 9:14 am » wrote: ↑

23 Aug 2022, 9:14 am

And that is the post I referenced earlier when I asked you what was absurd about it.

Last month no article was referenced.  Today, in your original post, no article was referenced.  So what is absurd about it?

Absurd about what?

Why lie about what I had posted this morning?

I've been consistent throughout the thread in what I have called absurd.

Your confusion is not my problem.

Huey » 23 Aug 2022, 9:11 am » wrote: ↑

23 Aug 2022, 9:11 am

Blackvegetable » 23 Aug 2022, 6:03 am » wrote: ↑

23 Aug 2022, 6:03 am

Huey » 28 Jul 2022, 10:00 am » wrote: ↑

28 Jul 2022, 10:00 am

James Madison funded development of weapons for the battlefield so in addition civilians can afford them.  Plus, the overlying context of the thread is the debunking the myth that framers could only envision muskets so the 2A was about muskets only.

Many weapons of the 1800s were designed for the battlefield.  There was no civilian prohibition.

This is one remarkably stupid human being.

 Note there is no article posted in the quote you are talking about.  That is from today.   You lied.

Blackvegetable » 23 Aug 2022, 6:03 am » wrote: ↑

23 Aug 2022, 6:03 am

Huey » 28 Jul 2022, 10:00 am » wrote: ↑

28 Jul 2022, 10:00 am

James Madison funded development of weapons for the battlefield so in addition civilians can afford them.  Plus, the overlying context of the thread is the debunking the myth that framers could only envision muskets so the 2A was about muskets only.

Many weapons of the 1800s were designed for the battlefield.  There was no civilian prohibition.

This is one remarkably stupid human being.