Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 23 Aug 2022, 10:07 am » wrote: ↑

23 Aug 2022, 10:07 am

Huey » 23 Aug 2022, 10:04 am » wrote: ↑

23 Aug 2022, 10:04 am

No,I posted the premise of the article.  Check your notifications.  It is exactly what I said it was.

You are out of your league again.

You don't even understand what a premise IS...

 

Huey » 23 Aug 2022, 9:34 am » wrote: ↑

23 Aug 2022, 9:34 am

Blackvegetable » 23 Aug 2022, 8:34 am » wrote: ↑

23 Aug 2022, 8:34 am

Huey » 23 Aug 2022, 8:30 am » wrote: ↑

23 Aug 2022, 8:30 am

I have already posted the premise of my post.  Deal with it or make your argument on your own.

It's not about "the premise of (your) post"...it's about the premise of your citation.

You don't even understand what that means.


 

THis is the premise of the citation:

Gun-control advocates often argue that gun-control laws must be more restrictive than the original meaning of the Second Amendment would allow, because modern firearms are so different from the firearms of the late 18th century. This argument is based on ignorance of the history of firearms. It is true that in 1791 the most common firearms were handguns or long guns that had to be reloaded after every shot. But it is not true that repeating arms, which can fire multiple times without reloading, were unimagined in 1791. To the contrary, repeating arms long predate the 1606 founding of the first English colony in America. As of 1791, repeating arms were available but expensive.

As I told you earlier.