User avatar
Huey
23 Aug 2022 10:23 am
User avatar
      
37,297 posts
Blackvegetable » 28 Jul 2022, 10:02 am » wrote: ↑
Huey » 28 Jul 2022, 10:00 am » wrote: ↑ James Madison funded development of weapons for the battlefield so in addition civilians can afford them.  Plus, the overlying context of the thread is the debunking the myth that framers could only envision muskets so the 2A was about muskets only.

Many weapons of the 1800s were designed for the battlefield.  There was no civilian prohibition.
Absurd is, by definition, absurd.


 

 
James Madison funded development of weapons for the battlefield
Since you started digging old posts (to run from anther thread) it is time for you to explain why that is absurd.  You quoted that comment of mine this morning.

Your turn. 
BV is in question time out indefinitely, until he takes the pledge to answer questions one for one.

The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
Updated less than a minute ago
© 2012-2026 Liberal Forum

Search