Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 23 Aug 2022, 11:40 am » wrote: ↑

23 Aug 2022, 11:40 am

Huey » 23 Aug 2022, 10:47 am » wrote: ↑

23 Aug 2022, 10:47 am

No, your job is to explain why what I posted is absurd concerning Madison and respond to why you have an issue with the citation. 

You dug up at least two old comments on this thread to avoid the other thread.  Present your case.  My case is made.

 

Lets evaluate your ****, Runner.

Blackvegetable » 28 Jul 2022, 10:02 am » wrote: ↑

28 Jul 2022, 10:02 am

Huey » 28 Jul 2022, 10:00 am » wrote: ↑

28 Jul 2022, 10:00 am

James Madison funded development of weapons for the battlefield so in addition civilians can afford them.  Plus, the overlying context of the thread is the debunking the myth that framers could only envision muskets so the 2A was about muskets only.

Many weapons of the 1800s were designed for the battlefield.  There was no civilian prohibition.

Absurd is, by definition, absurd.

 

James Madison funded development of weapons for the battlefield

Why is that absurd, Mary?  

Blackvegetable » 23 Aug 2022, 6:03 am » wrote: ↑

23 Aug 2022, 6:03 am

Huey » 28 Jul 2022, 10:00 am » wrote: ↑

28 Jul 2022, 10:00 am

James Madison funded development of weapons for the battlefield so in addition civilians can afford them.  Plus, the overlying context of the thread is the debunking the myth that framers could only envision muskets so the 2A was about muskets only.

Many weapons of the 1800s were designed for the battlefield.  There was no civilian prohibition.

This is one remarkably stupid human being.

Here is where you bumped it TODAY.  Again, the articles you reference were not part of the thread.  So why is the comment absurd?  Remember, to avoid another thread you bumped this old thread.  So make your case.  Then we will get to your diversion, Control Freak.