@BlackvegetableHuey » 23 Aug 2022, 11:53 am » wrote: ↑Lets evaluate your ****, Runner.Blackvegetable » 28 Jul 2022, 10:02 am » wrote: ↑Absurd is, by definition, absurd.Huey » 28 Jul 2022, 10:00 am » wrote: ↑ James Madison funded development of weapons for the battlefield so in addition civilians can afford them. Plus, the overlying context of the thread is the debunking the myth that framers could only envision muskets so the 2A was about muskets only.
Many weapons of the 1800s were designed for the battlefield. There was no civilian prohibition.Why is that absurd, Mary?James Madison funded development of weapons for the battlefieldHere is where you bumped it TODAY. Again, the articles you reference were not part of the thread. So why is the comment absurd? Remember, to avoid another thread you bumped this old thread. So make your case. Then we will get to your diversion, Control Freak.Blackvegetable » 23 Aug 2022, 6:03 am » wrote: ↑This is one remarkably stupid human being.Huey » 28 Jul 2022, 10:00 am » wrote: ↑ James Madison funded development of weapons for the battlefield so in addition civilians can afford them. Plus, the overlying context of the thread is the debunking the myth that framers could only envision muskets so the 2A was about muskets only.
Many weapons of the 1800s were designed for the battlefield. There was no civilian prohibition.