Liberal Forum

B.See » 08 Jul 2022, 8:48 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Jul 2022, 8:48 pm

Thank you BOTH for your contributions to the thread. I appreciate that you've stayed on topic.

You mean the '73 Roe vs. Wade decision that was based upon a woman's CONSTITUTIONAL right to privacy?

The DIFFERENCE has to do with CHOICE, specifically a woman's right to choice as opposed to that choice being removed via an act perpetrated by another party.

(above quote shortened due to character limitations)

C'mon. Donald Trump used "executive orders" to make (often constitutionally questionable) laws all the time. Some 200 PLUS of them.

So then, how many times have you protested the right to privacy for President Trump in having his home raided by our partisan the FBI gestapo?  
Bet you haven't uttered a peep about HIS privacy rights, have you?

Tells me you don't know **** about the 4th OR the 10th Amendment, and from your lack of knowledge it would appear that you've never even READ the US Constitution, have you?  Time to come clean and recognize the fact that your "right to privacy" DOES NOT include having the right to murder another person OR TO MURDER AN INFANT!  

Or perhaps would you like every murderer in prison today to be able to successfully mount the same legal defense for THEIR "privacy rights" for the murder they committed as well?