Liberal Forum

Huey » 19 Jan 2017 12:32 pm » wrote: You didn't corner me. Nor did I lie. You still have not shown where I am mandated to invest in a company.

Your original contention was that companies are exercising the rights of their owners. I disproved it, and you ran to, "Well you don't have to invest if you don't agree" - as if I could know BEFOREHAND what positions they might take.

Then you lied that you never even SAID they represented the individual owners - which is a flop that leaves you WITHOUT a premise, as we are right back to corporations have no God-given rights under American law - and ALL rights under American law are from the Creator.

Keep running in circles, barky dog - not chasing you around because you lie when cornered.

Here's you, claiming corporations are exercising their OWNERS' rights, not corporate rights, liar boy.

Huey » 10 May 2014 9:04 am » wrote: Citizens United, and the concept of unions, organizations, and yes, corporations which are all discussed in citizens united says that a group of people do not lose their rights because they are part of an organization. GE is not a person. A Union is not a person. But those that comprimise the group are. And they do not lose their rights because they formed a group.

Huey » 20 May 2014 4:40 am » wrote: The people that comprise Corporations, Unions, and other associations are free to excercise their freedom to assemble and collectively voice their first amendment rights. If you have a problem with that take it with the USSC.

Huey » 20 May 2014 1:31 pm » wrote: I support the rights of people who comprise unions, associations, and corporations to freely associate and practice their first amendment rights. So does the USSC as I posted earlier. If you do not support these constitutionally protected rights just say so.
Remember Ozzie, the UAW or GE does not have first amendment rights. But the people who comprise and run those entities do. Why do you wish to suppress their rights?