Huey » 20 Jan 2017 11:47 am » wrote:
By law, the key point of your question, is what my final answer pertains to. As far as I know they have done nothing wrong by law.
If you know otherwise please enlighten us. Or change your question.
This has to do with your philosophy, FAR more than it has to do with existing law.
Existing law is irrelevant, as enforcement mechanisms have been corrupted.
A big part of the corruption is your corrupt philosophy of government. Under the rules of FDR, corporations were required to operate in the public good, and THEN to the benefit of share holders.
Under Reagan's rules, their requirements were reduced to only the latter - benefiting share holders.
Since there is a mighty screech going on from conjobs about fake news, I'm checking in with you girls to see whether you are merely whining and crying even while winning, or if you have come around to MY view that corporations should be required to operate in the public interest or not at all.
From your answer, I divine that it's whining and crying, as regards fake news. Y'all don't want ot actually DO anything - just wanna bellyache.
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?