Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
No Holds Barred Political Forum
‹
WHAT DID CNN DO WRONG UNDER AMERICAN LAW, "CONS?"
20 Jan 2017 12:37 pm
What objective standard would you suggest?Huey » 20 Jan 2017 12:32 pm » wrote: Depends on your definition of objective standards.
Does the first amendment give an artificial person the right to monopolize any particular bandwidth of the public airwaves? If not, we can certainly take AWAY the bandwidth of any artificial person which operates against the interests of actual HUMAN BEINGS in our nation - can we not?
It was not long ago that salacious, yellow journalism was legally punishable. Was that a bad time in American history - should we be ashamed of the enforced journalistic standards of the 50s and 60s and 70s, before reagan and his successors pulled the FCC'S teeth?
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?