Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
No Holds Barred Political Forum
‹
WHAT DID CNN DO WRONG UNDER AMERICAN LAW, "CONS?"
22 Jan 2017 1:12 pm
And this assumes their only purpose to be collecting money, in the face of a CLEAR agenda to control the public discourse.Huey » 22 Jan 2017 10:01 am » wrote:
Besides, news organizations are held accountable.
It is called RATINGS. Bad ratings lead to low advertising dollars.
It also assumes that all advertising expenditures are based exclusively on ratings. They are not. Ratings cause demand and lead demand, ordinarily.
But certain advertisers could conceivably be willing to pay a premium, if they can influence programming. So the implicit assumption in your response is twice false.
When you have to rely on an implicit proposition which is demonstrably false, you've waived the white flag.
Those of us familiar with the business world have all heard the phrase, "You have to spend money to make money."
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?