User avatar
Cannonpointer
22 Jan 2017 1:22 pm
User avatar
98% Macho Man
98% Macho Man
45,445 posts
Huey » 22 Jan 2017 1:18 pm » wrote: As you compared now to the 30 and 40s you have a completely different dynamic. The "standards" back then were there for a leg image reason. Things like the fairness doctrine were there for a leg image reason. Ownership rules as well were there for a specific reason. All cable networks are not public domain. They are paid for broadcasts. You have to choose to watch them. So it would be nice for you to list these standards. I don't think you understand them.
Tell us how the rules were delegitimaized.

Tell us how the government was operating legitimately then, but would not be now, of they resumed enforcing standards of honesty and public benefit.
Huey » 22 Jan 2017 1:18 pm » wrote: Again, you are not prepared for this discussion. Hell, you reframed multiple times.
That's just your "confusion," son. You tried to reframe my positions and act confused. You're now pretending that government holding broadcasters to a standard was once legitimate and no longer is - but you will dance like a fiend before you give any reason why.
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice

"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"

You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.

Who cuts off your dick is not a friend

An opinion you won't defend is not your own

Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe

When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge

If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
Updated 1 minute ago
© 2012-2026 Liberal Forum

Search