WHAT DID CNN DO WRONG UNDER AMERICAN LAW, "CONS?" Post #11743 • Liberal Forum

Huey » 22 Jan 2017 1:57 pm » wrote: First, as you forcibly learned,

Only lesson I've learned from you is that rest areas need regular patrols, bathroomer.

Huey » 22 Jan 2017 1:57 pm » wrote: The most important reason is one you won't discuss either. Much, if not most of the country, were lucky to have one, never mind multiple sources of news, and later opinion. That was the reason not only for ownership rules, but also for the fairness doctrine. And both radio and later tv used those public airwaves the government of course could control it.

Nowadays there are multiple sources of news. The possibilities are endless and you know it. An individual has hundreds, if not thousands, of means of obtaining news. One is simply to change the channel. The other is online. So exactly what is the purpose for those rules, rules you won't name?

Thousands of outlets, owned by five corporations who decide our selections for every office in the land, son.

When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice

"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"

You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.

Who cuts off your dick is not a friend

An opinion you won't defend is not your own

Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe

When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge

If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?