29 Nov 2022 1:16 pm
Well done Skans. Hang on, let me humiliate @Blackvegetable really quick. Hey Veghead, this is an example of an intelligent rebuttal. He thought it through, then articulated it in his own words. He didn't strike through it all and say "no." or "You're a **** idiot." Then, turn around and call that it an intelligent rebuttal. That's why nobody here takes you seriously. You are stupid. A retard. A loser. A coward. A piece of ****. A dumb mother ****.Skans » 29 Nov 2022, 8:26 am » wrote: ↑ There is a logical argument to be made along those lines, Vegas.
However, let's look at this another way. Numerically, there is a Binary number system and non-binary number systems, indicating there are actually many different number systems. Just because there is a binary number system and non-binary number systems does not mean there are only two types of number systems. The logical fallacy is diverting attention away from what we are actually discussing is the broader context, i.e. "number systems". Outside of the binary number system, there may be many different number systems. Follow me so far?
Now, the Leftists claim there are more than two genders/sexes (yes, the terms are historically synonymous). The logical error the Leftists make is assigning the terms "binary" and "non-binary" to something other than a number system, i.e. Homo Sapiens. The term simply does not seamlessly carry over from a classification of a particular number system to a biological species, Homo Sapiens, as they would lead you to believe.
In the context of the species called Homo Sapiens, the question is "Can there possibly be more than one sex/gender within this species"? The answer to that is yes, but, it would be very rare such a being would not likely be capable of joining with another of the species to produce viable offspring. In discussing species, we would call that a mutation, a defect or an aberration from what is biologically necessary to perpetuate the species. Many such aberrations (not necessarily sex/gender related), in the absence of modern medical intervention, would quickly die after birth, or be of no consequence to the species as a whole.
So, while I like what you have done with logic, I still view it as a "piggy-back" off of the Leftist attempt to illogically conflate a number system with a biological species.
Ok Skans. I just needed to say that, sorry. Yes, you are correct. They are taking subsets of a category, then trying to separate it into a whole different category. For example, consider:
Set A = All the even numbers.
Set B = {2, 4, 6}.
Set B is not separate from set A, it is a subset of set A.
Non-binary, according to the dopes, is a spectrum between male and female. So, in the spirit of my above example:
Set A = all genders from male to female.
Set B = Male and Female.
Thus, set B is a subset of Set A.
Set B is part of set A. It is not a separate category.
Therefore, They can't say non-binary and binary are different categories when one contains the other. The only way they can separate the two is if they acknowledge that one is a subset of the other.
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...