User avatar
Vegas
29 Nov 2022 1:41 pm
User avatar
Beevee's Owner/Giant Slayer
Beevee's Owner/Giant Slayer
20,959 posts
Vegas » 22 Nov 2022, 5:09 pm » wrote: ↑
Blackvegetable » 22 Nov 2022, 2:37 pm » wrote: ↑ Yes.....that's why the conclusion of the sample of Republicans and conservatives is less reliable than the conclusion of the entire population surveyed.

Acknowledge that you've been answered.....again.
Read all of this you piece of ****. Not just 5 words. 

@Blackvegetable  on another note, you are making a "survivorship bias" fallacy. And **** you if you think I am going to define that for you. 

Like I said, I am not your mother. Look it up. 

You are focusing on the insufficiency of the Republican sample, while over looking the obvious systematic favoring of the dimocrat sample. Then, in all of your wisdom, you think that should be narrowed to a just a republican population as unreliable, when the population included the dims, repubs, and independents. You can't **** cherry pick the population of one over the other. That's the whole point of accurate sampling. 

Acknowledge that you are dumb as hell. 

 

 
 
Blackvegetable » 22 Nov 2022, 5:20 pm » wrote: ↑
Vegas » 22 Nov 2022, 5:17 pm » wrote: ↑ Yeah, I didn't expect you to know what that was. 

Nor did I expect you to look it up. 

Acknowledge that you lied again.
It's exactly because I do know that I know you are a **** moron.

Presidents don't drop out of the rankings because they die.

**** idiot.
 

 
@Blackvegetable  Go on, let's hear your desperate attempts to dance out of this. Get it over with.
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post: [/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...

From which you are running...



Image
Updated 3 minutes ago
© 2012-2026 Liberal Forum

Search