User avatar
Blackvegetable
29 Nov 2022 9:02 pm
User avatar
Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
54,995 posts
Vegas » 29 Nov 2022, 9:43 pm » wrote: The point is that he thinks he knows, when I had clearly shown that he didn't. Yet, with his usual arrogant conviction, he insists that he is right, as always. 

Here is the definition. His fallacy was that the article only considered 13% of Republicans (as opposed to 57% dims.). He was only focusing on the existing data of that 13%, when the sample clearly left out a huge sample of Republicans. The article even admitted that. He interpreted it as presidents who are alive. Hence, "survivorship." He was taking the word literally. I wouldn't care if he just admitted that he **** up. I would let it go. We all make mistakes, who cares? But his arrogant narcissistic retarded *** won't allow for that. Thus, I have no choice but to embarrass him.
Here is the definition. His fallacy was that the article only considered 13% of Republicans
No I didn't,  and no it doesn't. 

Lying imbecile 
He was only focusing on the existing data of that 13%, when the sample clearly left out a huge sample of Republicans
This is yet more **** gibberish, parking valet.
. The article even admitted that
This has nothing to do with "the article", you dumb piece of ****.

it is about the survey.
Updated 3 minutes ago
© 2012-2026 Liberal Forum

Search