User avatar
Cannonpointer
1 Dec 2022 10:41 pm
User avatar
98% Macho Man
98% Macho Man
47,191 posts
DeezerShoove » 01 Dec 2022, 8:31 pm » wrote: ↑ Well, that's what I start to wonder about.
Removing a bit of flesh from a baby boy's penis is acceptable.
The similar procedure for a girl's downstairs area? Not.

Both are traditional rituals.

If the boy's operation went beyond and "ruined" him, I'd say we'd agree it's too far.
Likewise for girls. That becomes mutilation.

How one became a ruinous sabotage and the other not must have to do with the second-class status women "enjoy" in some cultures.
Is there still a valid traditional female circumcision in the world these days (if there ever was)?
I sure don't know.

I also won't count on anyone here knowing the difference either.
Jews back male circumcision. They oppose female circumcision. 

They run this joint. 

Next mystery, please.
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice

"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"

You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.

Who cuts off your dick is not a friend

An opinion you won't defend is not your own

Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe

When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge

If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
Updated 2 minutes ago
© 2012-2026 Liberal Forum

Search