Liberal Forum

maineman » 08 Feb 2023, 10:42 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Feb 2023, 10:42 pm

I was not sleeping during civics class.  I know that politics is a team sport.  I know that majorities  of members in legislative chambers are required to coalesce around proposals in order for those proposals to become laws.

So what your saying is, a small handful of misogynists and groomers could never pull this **** off without a team of eager enablers. Got it, groomer. Continue.

maineman » 08 Feb 2023, 10:42 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Feb 2023, 10:42 pm

The two different "teams" on the playing field in our lifetime have been the democrats and the republicans.  The last time a party other than those two held a significant number of supports in America was the Whig Party of the 1830's-50's.  Since then, the two party D vs. R contest is the template under which all legislation is passed.  To suggest that any ONE or TWO issues would become so preeminent that they would cause their supporters to possibly turn their backs on a myriad of other equally important issues is juvenile.

Thank you for that admission, fruitcake - even though we all know you will treat abortion rights as a single issue. I know, I know - you're gonna lie about it.

The reason the two dishonest parties can work together in false opposition to the same end is that midwits like you willingly vote for evil in the retarded hope that it is "lesser" evil. If people voted their conscience, the parties would become regional and national players - no longer hegemons.

You excuse giving them hegemony with the argument that they have hegemony - and you're too stupid to see the irony. You veritably bleed unintentional irony, and you call others juvenile. You're a peace of work, fruitcake. Groom on.