Liberal Forum

maineman » 12 Feb 2023, 1:16 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Feb 2023, 1:16 pm

I actually know quite a bit.  As you may have forgotten, I was a weapons officer on a fast frigate and was proficient with every weapon in our ship's armory.  I earned both the Rifle and Pistol Expert medals very early on in my career.

My question is again...you say you are not against banning bump stocks, which are accessories designed to make a weapon deadlier.  But you said that magazines were necessary for a weapon to function... while dodging the obvious question as to whether or not you were also not against banning high capacity magazines that greatly increase the number of rounds per magazine and, therefore, also are accessories designed to make a weapon deadlier.  Try again little fella.