User avatar
Cannonpointer
12 Feb 2023 12:33 pm
User avatar
98% Macho Man
98% Macho Man
45,971 posts
Zeets2 » 12 Feb 2023, 1:29 pm » wrote: I've explained PRECISELY why we need to hear a SC NOMINEE respond to such a question.

The inquisitor DOES NOT need to defend his own definition of a woman, you idiot!
Neither he or I have even the slightest doubt as to how a woman is defined!  The Senate Judiciary committee is there to learn if the nominee has the wisdom and the ability to make decisions for the benefit of the country based on the accepted norms of what thousands of years of history have taught us.

AND IT'S CLEAR THAT SHE DOESN'T!!

And you can't stand seeing the nominee of the moron you voted for having her ignorance exposed before the world, can you?
FOS already defined it for the ***: A human with XX chormosomes. 

He screeched, "That's FEMALE," to which FOS responded (paraphrasing) a bitch dog is female, but not a woman. You asked for a definition of woman - not female. You got a definition of woman - it starts with human, and ends with xx chromosomes. 

Beevee prefers the midway to the sciencorium. 
 
 
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice

"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"

You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.

Who cuts off your dick is not a friend

An opinion you won't defend is not your own

Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe

When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge

If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
Updated less than a minute ago
© 2012-2026 Liberal Forum

Search