Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 12 Feb 2023, 1:21 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Feb 2023, 1:21 pm

Huey » 12 Feb 2023, 1:19 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Feb 2023, 1:19 pm

You have been screeching for two days demanding people define it.  

As I told you since I don’t need woman defined for me that debunks the OP.  Are your dense?  You are stupid.

Challenge: Can Any Of You FOX Dependent Slack Jaws Tell Me Why You Need "Woman" Defined For You?


Read it slowly, Verbul..
 

 

Blackvegetable » 12 Feb 2023, 1:33 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Feb 2023, 1:33 pm

Zeets2 » 12 Feb 2023, 1:29 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Feb 2023, 1:29 pm

I've explained PRECISELY why we need to hear a SC NOMINEE respond to such a question.

The inquisitor DOES NOT need to defend his own definition of a woman, you idiot!
Neither he or I have even the slightest doubt as to how a woman is defined!  The Senate Judiciary committee is there to learn if the nominee has the wisdom and the ability to make decisions for the benefit of the country based on the accepted norms of what thousands of years of history have taught us.

AND IT'S CLEAR THAT SHE DOESN'T!!

And you can't stand seeing the nominee of the moron you voted for having her ignorance exposed before the world, can you?

Post the thread title.

Then shut the **** up.