Publicly traded companies are not private, pookie, and are not allowed to violate public policy. The supreme court distinguished between publicly traded companies and privately held ones in the Hobby Lobby decision.
If facebook decided to follow Hobby Lobby and tell obama to **** off with regard to to providing every service required by the legislation, you would suddenly understand - with miraculous speed and clarity - the difference between private firms and publicly held ones, hypocrite.
Inventing a facile construction called "hate speech" with no legal definition is propaganda, fruity - falling for it is unmasculine, ******.
slideman » 12 Feb 2023, 3:25 pm » wrote: ↑
on its own website or doesn't want to traffic with people who have hate speech on their linked websites.
My idea of censorship is when the FBI gives them marching orders, fruitcake. Or when one campaign or another is allowed to dictate what does and does not get seen by the public - on a PUBLICLY TRADED platform.
slideman » 12 Feb 2023, 3:25 pm » wrote: ↑
You are very in favor of free speech until it comes to the free speech of these companies to who can choose whatever they want to put on their platform.
It's none of your goddamn business
It's not their platform. It's a public platform, responsible to maintain public policy. It's a corporation - it has LESS rights than a person, you stooge - not more.
You're not very smart are you
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?