Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
No Holds Barred Political Forum
‹
Weigh the risks of getting the vaccine, kids
13 Feb 2023 7:39 am
Big pharma will use any lie to discourage the use of Ivermectin because they cannot profit from the cheap generic drug.Bob » 13 Feb 2023, 7:55 am » wrote: ↑ Some of the headlines are claiming that 85% of men on Ivermectin were rendered infertile after the treatment, but there are several reasons to be very skeptical about this claim. Firstly, the research looked at 385 patients with onchocerciasis, but ultimately decided to only enroll 37 of them in the study, excluding a whopping 90% of potential participants due to initial low sperm counts. This alone is a huge red flag which wasn’t really addressed in the paper. Why was there such a high number of men with already low sperm counts in their study population? Well, that might well be due to the parasite itself.
Question, where is the research on people who do not have river blindness (onchocerciasis)?
Stevia was added to the USA food supply as an alternative to sugar but people don't know that the natives use stevia for birth control.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2fhDsDwEhZk
“Infertility in men is not a known side effect of ivermectin and is not included as a side effect in the labeling,” an FDA spokesperson said in an email to FactCheck.org. “The labeling for ivermectin and its bioequivalents states that ivermectin had no adverse effects on the fertility in rats in studies at repeated doses of up to 3 times the maximum recommended human dose of 200 mcg/kg (on a mg/m2/day basis). ”