Liberal Forum

roadkill » 12 Nov 2017 6:11 am » wrote:Juanita Broaddrick did say in an affidavit that Bill didn't rape her.

Then, after the fact, Ken Starr wanted to try and find out if Juanita had been intimidated into signing that affidavit...so Starr offered her immunity from perjury due Juanita's reasons for originally agreeing to the affidavit.

Juanita originally wanted to stay away from this whole thing...and one of the reasons was her fear of the Clintons.

So you think it's okay to commit perjury if you're scared?
Another issue I have with her is that she went to a fundraiser for Bill Clinton a few weeks after the alleged rape.

Maybe it's just me, but if someone brutally raped me, which is what she alleges he did, the last thing I would do is go to an event where he would be present.

Broaddrick said that she met Hillary for the first time at the fundraiser, and supposedly Hillary grabbed her arm and said, "Do you understand everything you do?"

Broaddrick said that she took that as a threat that Hillary was warning her to keep quiet, which would mean that Bill Clinton would have to had told her that he had raped Miss Broaddrick.

Do you think that he went home and told his wife that he had just raped someone?
And then he pointed her out in the crowd to Hillary, who had never met her, and said 'that's the woman I raped a few weeks ago?'

Does that sound logical to you?