Liberal Forum

Misty » 14 Nov 2017 2:54 pm » wrote: No I did not call her a liar.
I said I have a few issues with her story.

So you think that he brutally raped a woman and then went home and told his wife about it?
Because Miss Broaddrick contends that she felt that Hillary knew about the alleged rape just a few weeks after it happened.


How do you know what she told him?
Were you privy to that conversation?
And do you think that meant that she was giving him permission to commit rape?

Why are you allowed to question the Roy Moore accusers on the basis that they waited so many years to come forward, even though they told many people about their experiences with him over the years, and I am not allowed to question Juanita Broaddrick who also waited many years to come forward, denied that she was raped under oath at first, attended a fundraiser for Bill Clinton a few weeks after the alleged rape, and I believe only has one friend who said that she told her about the rape at the time?

There seems to be a lot more reasons to question Miss Broaddrick's accusations than the ones against Roy Moore.

Another thing you just ignore is the fact that there were a lot of anti-Clinton right wingers who were working very hard to bring down the Clintons.

One billionaire (Richard Mellon-Scaife) spent almost $2 million on the effort.

I do believe the accusations against other Libs, like Weinstein, Spacey, and Halperin, I just have a few issues with this particular case for the reasons I outlined.

You seem to believe all accusations made against Libs, and dismiss the ones that are made against Conservatives/Republicans.