Liberal Forum

maineman » 28 Jun 2023, 12:57 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Jun 2023, 12:57 pm

****. it's a wedding venue.  If the clown isn't in town, the wedding parties are swarming all over the place and the bathrooms and ballroom stage certainly aren't under constant Secret Service Protection.

Oh, and what you are telling me is that if a Federal Prosecutor directs the FBI to execute a search warrant, they can say no?

And tell me again, where did you go to law school, Doc?  

Still waiting on the 793 (e) intent quote.

Aw...heck with it... here... I am gonna post the entire text of that subsection and all you need to do is to quote this post of mine and highlight that passage.

(e)  Whoever having unauthorized possession of, access to, or control over any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, or note relating to the national defense, or information relating to the national defense which information the possessor has reason to believe could be used to the injury of the United States or to the advantage of any foreign nation, willfully communicates, delivers, transmits or causes to be communicated, delivered, or transmitted, or attempts to communicate, deliver, transmit or cause to be communicated, delivered, or transmitted the same to any person not entitled to receive it, or willfully retains the same and fails to deliver it to the officer or employee of the United States entitled to receive it; or

I'll wait, but I won't hold my breath.