Liberal Forum

Misty » 16 Feb 2018 2:40 am » wrote:

Termin8tor » 15 Feb 2018 3:45 pm » wrote:Yes, they did cover it. They noted the truth; that you can't violated anyone's Constitutional rights on the basis of a weakly based, poorly documented pretext.

Weakly based and poorly documented?
We are talking about people who the Social Security Administration has deemed so severely mentally ill that they required a third party to handle their benefits.

You can't violate someone's Constitutional rights on such weak grounds.

Go argue with the ACLU, psycho.

But now we know which side you're on; for violating Americans' Constitutional rights.

And you are on the side of people with severe mental illness being able to buy guns.

**** you, psycho. That someone has a problem with math and finances doesn't make them incompetent to defend themselves under the Constitution, nor does it give an unaccountable bureaucracy the right to violate anyone's Constitutional rights.

Had your party written legislation to do actual competency tests to these individuals, that might well have been appropriate.

But you're a fascistic leftist hack who would let a bureaucracy violate American's Constitutional rights without due process.

I'm more than happy you've admitted that.

It's funny how all of the Republicans who voted for that bill and the dotard who signed it into law are now saying that it's not a gun problem, it's a mental illness issue.

It is.

So address it properly and deal with it without violating Americans' Constitutional rights.